canon extender ii vs iiicanon extender ii vs iii

Caution Do not attach two or more Extenders on the same camera. To use extenders effectively though you have to understand their strengths and weaknesses. The 300mm f2.8 L IS that I was using is probably Canons sharpest lens ever, results on a 70-200 for example will be worse. I find the AF slows significantly using the 2x on the 70-200II in less than bright conditions. Canon TS-E 90mm f/2.8 Tilt-Shift Lens. In these lighting conditions though there is a noticeable drop in the number of tack sharp keepers but the rate is still reasonable. Unlike the 1.4x, the 2X has always had a noticeable detrimental effect on image quality. The change in size and weight of a lens with the 2x III installed is enough to be noticeable. More testing will confirm, but I've been testing with a pair of 2X converters stacked, and AF seems fast and accurate. Well discuss how it works, what its made of, and how well it performs in real-world scenarios. Yours is a slightly different issue. --. Take this a useful guide but not necessarily gospel! You always have to give something to gain something. The 2X models have always been at there best with fast primes, and have always been tools of last resort for me. The 2xIII works nicely on the 70-200II however focusing speed is reduced by 50% so be aware of that. Considering that an extender can have nearly $20,000 worth of camera and lens attached to it, the extra strength insurance can be appreciated. counter the pincushion distortion to a small extent. The new mark iii 1.4x teleconverter is head and shoulders above the previous versions. There is a noticeable difference between the EF and RF 2x TCs on the EF 600/4 II, with the EF 2xIII delivering sharper results in the center and periphery. The mounted extender also shifts the lens weight forward slightly for a potential change of balance. The price difference between 1.4 x and 2 x isn't much, so weighing up the pro's and cons of 1.4 x vs 2 x and II vs III. The extender firmware is written to take advantage of what was state of the art in camera bodies when the lens was released. At the start F/5.6 picture quality is poor. Here is the list of these lens reviews which is also the comprehensive-at-review-time list of currently available extender compatible Canon lenses. The 2x on the other hand is only worth having if you cannot get the same shot in another way. Shooting with the Canon EF 2x III Extender mounted results in reduction of autofocus speed. I seldom use them, so upgrading to double the price is not for me. Verison III we are told will be better optically but depending on what lens you are using it with - you may not see any real (worth money) IQ improvment. EF 400mff /2..8 LUSMandIIa&b -EF28~105 mmf /35~ 4 .5 ~ 5 . Even at F/4 IQ is very good.IQ with Extender 2xIII is affected. Do you need more macro magnification from your Canon EF 180mm f/3.5L Lens? Today I was using my Canon 1D MkIV with the EF 500mm L IS and the 1.4 Extender. These are the facts, now you have to figure out how to get around these problems. And their 1.4 extenders are no exception. Will be coupled with EF 300mm f/4 L IS and a 7D Mark II -- maybe sometimes with an EF 70-200 f/4L IS and same body. The AF speed again seemed to be about on par with the previous version and at wider apertures this MKIII 2x still took a heavy toll on the IQ of the images. List of lenses that are compatible with the EF 1.4x II and EF 2x II extenders. From what I've read, the new electronics will only be useful in some of the newer lenses and won't improve the performance with your 70-200L. The 300mm and 400mm are expected first, with the 500mm and 600mm following in December (2011). The image below was captured with a Canon EOS 5D Mark III + EF 2X III + Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Sport. --------------------------------------------------------. The biggest difference you see when swapping from a 1.4x to a 2x extender is the instant change in AF tracking accuracy. Because the Canon EF 2x III Extender is multiplying the aberrations/flaws of the lens it is mounted behind by 2x and because there are now 9 Not only will AF point availability be limited, the AF speed will take a hit, too. I wrote about the MII 2x extender here before, so you might want to take a quick look at that for a couple of samples as well. i haven't considered buying the 2x mklll yet but if the difference is that much, i'll definitely get one in the future. Thanks. Here are some tips to get you started. Not just weight, but bulk too. 1st it's a hobby Extender Model: 1.4x II: 2x II: 1.4x III: 2x III: 1.4x II: 2x II: 1.4x III: 2x III: Actual Aperture: f/5.6: f/8: f/5.6 . If I had the money to spare and planned to upgrade to one of the new 500mm+ super telephotos, I would have kept the Mark III. So after reading your post, I am confused as I am a beginner and do not yet understand some of the jargon. Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS USM Lens Notice the slight color change of the two Series III Extenders pictured in the center above. Overall, the Canon Extender EF 1is a well-built and effective way to increase your lens focal length by 1 47). If you refer to Canon 70-200mm 2.8L IS II USM + Extender 2x III, then you'd get f/5.6 all over the focal length range vs. the EF 100-400 f/4.5-5.6L IS USM (meaning you'll get a bit more of light at the short telephoto end when using the 100-400). My extender purchase advice is similar to the advice I gave in the Canon 1.4x EF Extender III Review. The 2x III grew 2.6 oz (75g) heavier than, and is .21" (5.3mm) shorter than, the The Mark III also has much less CA (although when shooting RAW lots of CA can be fixed up anyway, if not quite entirely). But how do you use them? which can make it appear to resolve more detail. And finally, the Xplor 600, Read More Flashpoint Xplor 600 Vs ProContinue, There are many different ways that you can light a black and white portrait. The series III extender results are the last set (with 1.4x III and with 2x III) of focal lengths available for each lens. The lens release button on the MKIIIs is also larger than on the previous version and it feels a lot nicer under the thumb in operation. I can answer but partly.i havent used Extender II but use Extender III , both 1.4x III and 2x III , with EF 300 mm F/2.8 L II lens on 5D Mark IV body.IQ with Extender 1.4x III is hardly affected. The first is price the III is about double the cost of the II. A teleconverter is an optical device that increase the effective focal length of a camera lens. In fact when the 1.4x II was released, it was said that weather sealing was added, superior optical coatings, but the lens assembly was unchanged. they auto-focused just like with a bare lens.I can not see a difference in IQ. The obverse is not true. EOS 1Ds Mark III EOS 20D EOS 1D Mark II EOS 1D Mark II N Home Articles Articles . Compare the native maximum focal length to the extended focal length to see the optical change from the selected combination. Essentially, it magnifies the image that your lens is able to capture. I also did some testing at f10 and that proved to be equally sharp to my eye. We hope you find this chart helpful! Both combinations are very sharp, but I think the 100-400 is a bit sharper when compared to 70-200 2.8L II + extender 2x III, noticeable if you use . Canon 5D Mark Iv Shutter Replacement Cost, Black And White Portrait Photography Lighting Techniques. The 2X imparted a much bigger hit on AF speed than the 1.4x. The only advantage would be in the weather sealing arena. Much the same story here with the 2x extenders. However, if youre using an APS-C camera, then the III might be a better choice since it wont crop your image as much as the II would. I've tried to do some research on this before posting, and the consensus of what I can see online is that:- For 1.4x the difference in IQ between the II and III is minimal- For the 2x the difference in IQ between the II and III is enough that it's worth getting the III over the II.Can anyone with experience with these extenders weigh in? Due to the nature of the work (and the fact that I was working) , it wasnt possible to do comparative photos tediously switching from one extender to the next. The 2x II added pincushion distortion to the lens it was used with whereas the 2x version III adds slight barrel distortion. more impacting, a decrease in image quality and maximum aperture. All extenders soften your image, particularly at wider apertures. The attachment is made from durable metals and polycarbonates, and it features weather-resistant gaskets to protect your camera gear from the elements. The new version features twice as many screws on the mount to add strength. Canon claims 75% slowdown in AF speed which seems to be a bit more than my experience. Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM Lens Its a great way to extend the reach of your lenses, and its also very affordable. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting! IMG5 = new Image(604, 404) Engineers cannot design for the unknown future, and so using an older lens design with the latest and greatest camera body can result in limited performance and AF point availability.The 7D2 has only one f/8 AF point, the center AF point. creates a very dark viewfinder that makes manual focusing difficult. The Extender 2x III has Canons Super Spectra coating for reduced ghosting and flare. For that kind of scenario the 2x is still worth having but use it wisely ! Weve got you covered with this handy compatibility chart. The following list of discontinued lenses fitting these parameters are compatible, but may require camera microfocus calibration for accurate focusing (note that not all DSLR cameras support microfocus calibration): Canon EF 200mm f/1.8 L USM Lens Solution. After a few hundred images, I decided to send the Mark III back for a refund. There was little implied IQ improvement by Canon using the older super telephotos or zooms with the version III TCs. -EF 100-300mm f/5..6L USM EF 1.4x III and EF2x III extenders are recommended for use with EOS . To ensure this is working optimally, you should always attach the lens to the extender before attaching the extender to the camera body. Some of the extender-compatible lenses start with an f/5.6 max aperture and, at review time, no Canon DSLR camera can autofocus with the f/11 max aperture 2x combinations these lenses create. The Canon 180 L Macro is a lens that performs very well with extenders. two at 400mm and two at 300mm, with my new Canon 100-400mm mark ii lens and there was virtually ZERO difference between the shots with vs . Anomalous dispersion glass elements are used in the Series III extenders to reduce chromatic aberration and increase resolution and contrast. But I wonder if the 280mm you get with a 70-200 + 1.4x will be long enough for your needs. But if youre on a budget, the Canon 1.4 Extender II is still a very good lens that will serve you well. The huge focal length increase of course comes with some penalties, including a modest financial cost, some size and weight addition and more impacting, a decrease in image quality and maximum aperture. The latest versions for DSLRs are the Extender EF 1.4x Mark III and the Extender EF 2x Mark III. But, Canon does not recommend using ETs at all due to reduced autofocus accuracy. I would however use an extender if the sun is off at 90 degrees to my subject or more. Photojournalism, law enforcement and many other types of photography can also make good use of them. I did some systematic test shots of a Coke can, two at 400mm and two at 300mm, with my new Canon 100-400mm mark ii lens and there was virtually ZERO difference between the shots with vs without the 1.4 - it was impressive! Buying an extender over a longer lens for financial reasons can also make sense. Here are some things to keep in mind when using this popular teleconverter: Canon 5D Mark III (x2), BG-E11 Grips, 7D (x2) BG-E7 Grips, Canon Lenses 16-35 f/4 L IS, 17-40 f/4 L, 24-70 f/4 L IS, 70-200 f/2.8 L IS II, 70-200 f/4 L IS, 70-200 f/4 L IS Version II, 100-400 f/4.5-5.6 L IS Version II, TS-E 24 f/3.5 L II, 100 f/2.8 L Macro IS, 10-22 f3.5-4.5, 17-55 f/2.8 L IS, 85 f/1.8, Canon 1.4 Extender III, 5 Canon 600 EX-RT, 2 Canon ST-E3 Transmitters, Canon PRO-300 Printer. Find many great new & used options and get the best deals for Canon Extender EF 1.4X III Teleconverter -Near Mint- #62 at the best online prices at eBay! EF 28-90 , 28 @ 2.8 , 50 @1.8 , 28-135 IS Whats worth noting from this example is that the overall light level is much less. Since many Canon EOS camera bodies need a max aperture of f/5.6 or wider to autofocus, losing 2 stops of max aperture pushes f/4 and narrower lenses past their ability to autofocus. Heres a breakdown of the two options to help you make a decision. Looks like the original 1.4 is not a bad choice, for the right price. http://www.usa.canon.com ArticleAct&articleID=3602Scroll down and there's a good explanation about the III series. Autofocus with Canon 1.4 Extender - Series II vs. Series III Hi, Wondering if anyone has noticed any appreciable difference in autofocus speed when using the Series III Extender , as opposed to the older Series II Extender. In June 2011 I had the opportunity to head to France and shoot the 24 Hours of Le Mans, the worlds greatest motor race. (primarily Canon L Series lenses), extending the focal length of the lens by a very noticeable 2x. I am grateful for your support! Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM Lens In each row, the left-most mouseover label is the native resolution of the combination and The biggest downside to using a 2x extender, in my opinion, is the image quality reduction it causes. Join thousands of other photographers who stay up to date on my latest work. How big are the improvements between the different versions of this extender? but it comes with an image quality penalty. The slight difference in color can be seen with the MKIII extender and this 500mm f4 L IS New larger lens release button on the MKIII versions MKIII on the left and MKII on the right. The huge focal length increase of course comes with some penalties, including a modest financial cost, some size and weight addition and Starts improving from F/6.3 onwards till F/8.This leads to high ISO but used with R5 or R6 this will not lead to noise issues as these two mirrorless bodies handle high ISO very well as being reported. I think I am definitely more confident that the extenders will work well with my 100-400 II and R6 combo, and make me lean more towards the 1.4x as the priority. Thus, if the longer focal lengths are going to see significant use, the 100-400 L II has the overall advantage including smaller size, lighter weight, lower price, better AF performance and better image quality. Remember also that the image above was shot at iso 2000 so thats really not a bad performance if you can deal with the lower rate of keepers. A significant disadvantage brought by the use of a 2x extender (any of brand or model of them) is that your lens' max aperture setting This is the lone, but very significant, advantage provided by extenders. With the 5D Mark IV's new AF system, all AF points are active with with an f/8 lens, so I still get great compositional flexibility. Canon TS-E 24mm f/3.5L II Tilt-Shift Lens This is because the extra glass can throw off the distance measurement that your cameras autofocus system uses. Well have to wait and see. Canon EF 500mm f/4.0L IS USM Lens Stopping the lens down one to two stops A 2Xextender turns an f/4 lens into an f/8 lens, and that's an iffy proposition, even on a 7D2. A 1.4x extender will decrease your maximum aperture by 1 stop. Canon EF 2.0X III Telephoto Extender for Canon Super Telephoto Lenses (Renewed) Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L is II USM Lens, Lens Only VILTROX C-AF 2X II TELEPLUS 2.0X Teleconverter Auto Focus Telephoto Extender Lens Converter for Canon EF Mount Super Telephoto Lens 70-200mm 100-400mm and DSLR Camera 80D 5DII For my winter ski work I take the 300mm and extenders because I simply could not ski all day with a 600mm on my back. The lens is also at f5.6 so its only stopped down a tiny bit from its maximum of f4.o. So if you have a crop sensor camera or one of Canons mirrorless cameras, youll need to look elsewhere for an extender solution. Great extender for my needs Shiftysdad I did some systematic test shots of a Coke can, two at 400mm and two at 300mm, with my new Canon 100-400mm mark ii lens and there was virtually ZERO difference between the shots with vs without the 1.4 - it was impressive! Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more and all is free. My personal opinion is that the 2x III's improvements are worth the difference in price, but we all value our images and money differently. There are a lot of factors to consider when trying to answer this question. It is more money, but the overtime earned from last month needs a home and I guess it's like a lot of things, buy cheap, buy twice. I could not see an appreciable difference in the AF speed and accuracy at all when used with current lenses. So there is some new technology hidden inside these things that we have yet to unlock and as such I cant really comment on that new aspect. But it does seem autofocus with the 70-200f/2.8L II IS is very quick with version III. The original Canon 2x extender, the Extender EF 1.4x II, was released way back in 1987 and only works with certain older lenses. Canon EF Extender 2X III Teleconverter #817 $240.04 Free shipping or Best Offer Canon EF Extender 2X III Teleconverter #340 $240.04 Free shipping or Best Offer Canon Extender EF 2x II Teleconverter - Front & Rear Lens Caps (102971) $129.95 0 bids $6.00 shipping 4d 11h Canon Extender EF 2x Teleconverter Lens for EF Mount From Japan [Excellent] 5 ~ 4 . 03/28/2023: New firmware version 1.0.3.1 is available for, 03/14/2023: New firmware version 1.8.1 is available for, 01/18/2023: New firmware version 1.1.1 is available for, 01/09/2023: Help ensure your autofocus is properly aligned with a, 12/08/2022: New firmware version 1.0.5.1 is available for, 12/07/2022: New firmware version 1.7.0 is available for, 11/16/2022: We're thrilled to be ranked among the, 08/31/2022: New firmware version 1.1.1 is available for, 08/09/2022: New firmware version 1.2.0 is available for, 07/14/2022: New firmware version 1.0.1 is available for, 06/07/2022: New firmware version 1.3.2 is available for, 05/26/2022: New firmware version 1.0.5.1 is available for, 05/26/2022: New firmware version 1.0.3.1 is available for, 05/10/2022: Keep your Canon gear in optimal condition with a, 05/05/2022: We are excited to announce that we have refreshed the, 03/23/2022: New firmware version 1.0.3.1 is available for. Using an extender also reduces the amount of light coming into the camera by one f-stop. Great link, thanks! If you want a 2x TC, then the III may be the better choice. Extenders do not affect the MFD (Minimum Focus Distance) of the lens they are mounted behind, Finally, theres build quality the III is made from higher-quality materials than the II. Improvements in the Series III extenders promise to perform especially well on these specific lenses. -The minimum focus distance with the extender attached While both brands produce great colors, I think Nikon has the edge. If youre looking for an easy way to get closer to your subject matter without spending a lot of money on a new lens, then the Canon Extender EF 1 4X III could be a great option for you8). Of course, to get an extender at all is the first decision to make. There's a MkI for sale near me. A microcomputer integrated into the Series III Extenders promises faster autofocusing and increased AF precision The extenders do not have provisions to update their firmware to accommodate new lenses, AFAIK. Canon EF 400mm f/5.6L USM Lens Accordingly, overall AF performance remains essentially unchanged with an EF Extender attached, versus the lenss AF speed without an extender.". In the Fall of 2010 Canon announced the introduction of new MKIII extenders to replace the previous MKII versions. Its a better lens in every way. The image quality of lenses varies from model to model; and therefore, the optical results of the various with-extender combinations also vary. The 1.4x III adds some barrel distortion to the lens it is being used with. In addition to having an impact on effective aperture, extenders can also impact the number of available AF points. If you buy something through one of these links, I might make a small commission. is reduced/narrowed by a 2 stops allowing at most 1/4 as much light into the exposure. Image of the Canon 2x III Extender. Canon EF 600mm f/4.0L IS USM Lens Canon EF 200mm f/2.8L II USM Lens If youre a Canon shooter looking to extend the reach of your lenses, youve probably considered picking up a Canon 2x extender. It is obvious that extenders produce better results than simply increasing the size of an image in Photoshop The lens mount pin and lens mount stopper pin are improved for higher endurance and, While they do not fit together due to the lack of space at the rear elements, f/4 on a tripod, and shot at an item about 50' away. This is something I'm considering to pair with a future R5 or R6 and my current Canon 100-400mm II, if that makes a difference. as you can see below, there are now 7 (instead of 4) screws holding the rear lens mount to the body. Sports and wildlife are two of the most common photography pursuits utilizing extenders. Canon claims AF speed reduction of 50% with a 1.4x and 75% with a 2x extender. I've not used them. Canon extender Mark III vs Mark II. A step up!! The Canon 1.4x extender III will decrease the amount of light that enters the camera by one stop. But either way, you cant go wrong with a Canon 1.4 extender! With Extender EF2X III, the maximum aperture will be smaller by 2 stops. Brightest Lumen is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising & linking to Amazon properties. Its also got a higher wattage rating of 600W vs 500W for the Pro. Have you tried it in lower light? And, as shown in my Canon EF 2x III Extender review examples above, the Each has its pros and cons, so it really comes down to what youre looking for in a lens. Canon TS-E Tilt-Shift lenses are not included on Canon's official compatibility chart and do not have the 3 additional gold lens contacts for communicating extender information to the camera, IMG6.src = 'https://media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/2x-Extender-100.jpg' I was doing some AF Micro-Adjusting yesterday and we compared the resolution between these 2 and it is noticeably better.

Are Selenite Lamps Safe For Cats, 2015 Bennington 21 Slx, Articles C